Imagine if, hypothetically, American whites drove out all the other races, and were left with a completely homogenous white society, and the revolution destroyed the current ZOG govt. What political ideology would the New America be founded upon? The homogenity factor is important because most people charge that "white people can't win in a democracy". Well, it would be impossible for them not to win if there were no other interests (Jew lobby) to cater to. I believe in the mantra "whoever governs least governs best", and would want to return back to the roots of this country and restore the constitution to the point where it was at before it was changed to conform to Marxism/Talmudic law. National Socialism eliminates the ultra-capitalism that plagues a democratic republic, but then again, so does the removal of Jews from the area ]shit i didnt get the poll

 

I voted fascism, but my ultimate preference is absolute monarchy; fascism was the closest option on your list.

absolute democracy is most in practice today in Switzerland.

and it's perils are starting to show even in that land which still has a pretty stable population

It would take National Socialism to get to the point you speak of but once there democracy would be the best.

One would have to discuss the differences that Plato had in writing "The Republic" and those of the founding fathers.

I'm no political scholar but the main thing breaking down both systems is PAC's and the jew media... and xtianity allowing both to flurish.

One thing is certain. Whatever governmental system chosen the govt. can't be allowed to subsidise capitalism in order to stiffle it. They can regulate and should regulate laws regarding products and services but to go further would be a downward slide. Gold should be allowed to be owned and traded freely. Ownership of property should be absoulte... unlike in the usa. A central bank independent of the govt is important too... albeit not controled by jews unlike now. Citizenship should be sold to foreigners for a high premium to generate cash for the govt. Colonialism should be discouraged due to its obvious risk. Once racial solidarity is established a military should be funded for defense ONLY. Taxes should be based on sales of products and services bought and NOT income. Welfare should be liberal but in only cases of single mothers or medical.

A central bank independent of the govt is important too... albeit not controled by jews unlike now.

Todd,

Do you think a Jew-free central bank that is with the goverment (a pro-White goverment) would be a good idea? Just curious.

The biggest problem I have with Nazism is the fact that one leader is given supreme power. What if he is a meglomaniac asshole bent on consolidating his power like many of the kings of old? Anyway, I suppose most people here would vote for National Socialism.

In times of crisis a dictator is beneficial to overcome the circumstances (jews).

Once control and solidarity is regained a democracy can be re-established... per a set definition of time until there is war again. In an all white world there will still be war because the children will forget how bad it was for us and there will still be special interest and greed. Poles will fight Irish and vice versa and the "who is the whitest" debate will continue... rightfully so.

In a perfect world there is no non whites... That will take centuries and the best form of govt to manage that is NS, imho.

I voted fascism, but my ultimate preference is absolute monarchy]Yeah I pretty much considered fascism to be sort of the same thing. Mussolini coined the term fascism, but when you think about, Fascist Italy's political structure was not much different than a traditional monarchy. The only flaw was that Mussolini still allowed King Victor Emmanuel, who supposedly had symbolic power, to remain an important figure in the govt., and it later it bit him in the ass when he was deposed.

 

Todd,

Do you think a Jew-free central bank that is with the goverment (a pro-White goverment) would be a good idea? Just curious.

I don't trust any govt. but they are a necessary evil. It is not necessary to leave the interest of the nations cash with the govt.... talk about absolute control.

It is the responsibilty of the govt to be responsible for the taxes we give it. If they can control interest rates they won't have to be responsible any longer... they can make money themselves w/o relying on the taxpayers even though they still get that money. W/O control of the bank or gold they have to pay attn to what they are doing in regards to the money we give them. Checks and balances go out side the Senate.

I also think that the police and military and the justice dept. should be a corporation contracted by the govt to keep things less under the table when it comes to justice. When a prosecutor and a judge is working for the same person it is a conflict of interest. When the citizens pay the corporation there is much less of a chance that the govt will tell them what to do. It's not perfect but it is a start.

The type or "form" of government truly depends on the situation we face. There is really no "best" governmental structure, all of them have their strengths and weaknesses. Democracy may be great for personal freedom but it's not good for the collective interests or internal health of an nation. I guess I would prefer an aristocracy or monarchy or maybe some type of constituional republic. It really depends on where you put the primacy on the on the "individual vs. the group" debate and your outlook on human nature. In my opinion if we are survive and act as a single organic unit the individual must be submerged to the group, we need to make internal political structures which allow us to do just that. Democracy affords us no leadership and can once again led to the de-racialization and atomism of the group and threaten our political power vis-a-vis the outgroups. One might also say that all whites should be educated to learn racialism and everything we be alright, thus democracy with racially conscious whites will "work". However their will alway be traitors and in the end democracy could will leave our society fractured, split and breed "individualism".

Individualism under racial solidarity is far better than where we are now... be it via a democracy or not.

Under a republic the citizens elect leaders to represent them and they in turn lobby them for issues. Not so bad considering the citizens can spend time doing other things instead of paying attn to politics all the time.

Our problem is that we allow our enemies to lobby our elected officials... those enemies being the jews that want zionism

The Reichsbank was a key element in the resurrection of the broken German Nation to greatness.

You can no more get rid of banks than you would religion. A central bank however should be controlled by the national government and not international banking class particulalry the jews such as our Federal Reserve and Chairman Jew Greenspan.

National Socialism, until eugenics programs have purified the gene pool of defects and weaknesses, and sorted families into a hierarchy of genetic quality.

After that, perhaps a hereditary aristocracy, with the highest 10% of families being the nobility, and the best family of all being the royalty.

There could be some provision among the nobles for accepting new families among them, upon proof of meriting the advancement, and for ejecting back into the peasantry families whose members had brought disgrace upon their race. The possibility for advancement would motivate the commoners to strive for excellence in their breeding and behavior, and the possibility of ejection would motivate the noble families to ensure that such disgraces did not happen, even if they had to shoot one of their own to prevent it from happening.

Jerry Abbott

Jerry Abbott,

You are "talking my kinda language". LOL

.

Sounds all well and good until a few people get sick of taxation w/o representation and have a Boston Tea Party.

The natural order of things is for there to be law and order followed by decay of values and then anarchy... all to start over again. Onward and upward.

A White republic seems just fine [i.e. like we had in America in about 1800].

-----